Child of gaping deepness
The animal is a kid of the fullness of what is naturally given. The human specificity is different. This one depends from a radical different order, the order of the spirit, which is not child of the full but son of the vacuum. This paradox is likely to be insupportable. However without it you stay beside the full comprehension of human reality.

The animal is undoubtedly too full with his animal being to be open to the spirit… To reach a higher order implies the immense crossing of a gaping vacuum. Man experiments this permanently. Why can the chimpanzee not be humanized? Many `reasons', physical or sociological ones, are advanced in turn to explain the emergence of what is specificaly human. You can find the one or the other in a living being without finding traces of humanization. What about the extraordinary socialization of the termites? What about the very prolonged childhood of rabbits? What about the relative weight of the brain of a ouistiti, twice times higher than that of man?
What distinguishes man from other anthropomorphous mammals does probably not hold in a `more'. As if the monkey missed something to become a man. It is rather the opposite which is likely to be true. It is through his gaping shortage that man became man. It is through the hollow of its gaping being that the human one could emerge. After that the `more' can come by addition.

Why
can't the chimpanzee get humanized? Many 'causes', physics or
sociological ones, are in turn advanced to explain the emergence of
the specific human. Every one of these 'causes' can as well be found
in this or that living creature without for as much their presence is
accompanied by humanization. The extraordinary socialization of the
termites? The very prolonged childhood of rabbits? The relative
weight of the brain of a marmoset, twice times higher than that of
man?
goto