Including
and included
The epistemological
and pragmatic space is defined by a frame of reference, a horizon,
axes and a center. A frame of reference
which determines the fundamental dimensions. A horizon
which traces the limits of theoretical and practical
possibilities and impossibilities. Axes
marking the main outlines of force according to which this possibility
is articulated. A center,
node of convergence of the fundamental axes.
Unless being only a
house of deaths, a tomb or a prison, a house of living creatures can
only be an open one. A house with entries and exits. A house open to
the breath of the Spirit. Far beyond what we take too quickly as an
'impassable horizon'.

Tell me what you
include... I mean the ultimate space out of which there is for you
nothing than emptiness and indifference. Thus the total space of the
'house' which you live in and who gives you all you need (materially,
socially, psychologically, intellectually, spiritually) to live and
survive. Your absolute 'oïkos'.
Behind included spaces, there are including ones, and finally an ultimate including space. And this one is the space of the sense of sense. Where is it ultimately?
Finite
or
infinite
totality
Fundamentally
'there is' or 'I am'
Closed
or open space
Cyclic
or vectorial temporality
Immanence
or Transcendence
Same
order or different
orders
Man
or
God

Something like an
anthropocentric rupture begins to be felt in our occident as from the
year 1100. When our ultimate including space is being no longer
solely God but man himself.

The
key of human intelligibility is not in the included
contents but in the including
big whole. The inside becomes fully understandable only
starting from the outside. It is from outside and from outside only
that the 'whole' lights actually. The whole is more essential than
its parts. It's the forest that explains the trees and not the
reverse.
But how can you
measure a space inside this space itself? We are taken on board. The
Einsteinian theory of relativity can be used as paradigm. The
'length' of our meters and the 'duration' of our terrestrial clocks
are necessarily 'deformed' by their space-time localization. We can
only measure with our deformations. That requires a mental exit. You
have to leave.

Impassable horizon?
Today's human possibility feels trapped into its horizon. At the same
time it hopelessly tries to cross the limits. When totality spreads
only in pure immanence there is no more space elsewhere. 'Trans'
itself can only function in immanent enclosure. Simply as a limited
verb 'transcending' without transcendence.
For the spirit which
thus lost its natural opening to go beyond itself there can remain
only one possibility of exit. And this one can only be 'negative',
meaning something like an act of rupture. But it is impossible to
leave the cave differently. One needs such a daring and violent risk.
goto