Between
Alpha and Omega
We never exist but 'between'.
Between borders delimiting our epistemological and pragmatic
possibilities. It is there, in our 'middle' between 'extremes', that
we endeavor to know and act. It is there that spreads our science and
our technology. It is there that we build and organize our world.

So many mysteries surround us and
so many questions, already in the field of the simple material
nature. Is the universe really system, mega-system, or is it an
irreducible scattered plurality? Are our epistemological
possibilities regarding the universe total or simply regional? Is the
universe, may it be total or regional, understandable in a
homogeneous or in a heterogeneous way? What is really 'matter'? What
is energy? What is space-time? Is time absolutely irreversible? Is
the cosmos unique or is there a plurality of worlds? Is this possible
plurality basically complementary or is it antagonistic? Do there
exist anti-universes? Are the interactions we know (and we unify) the
only interactions?
Are today's principles of
scientific intelligibility, conquered on not-scientists or
prescientific intelligibilities,
absolute or only transitory? Is the space of our scientific
intelligibility homogeneous and governed right through by the same
type of intelligibility, as today's science postulates it? Which is
the probability of future
radical
epistemological revolutions? In relation to the totality, is there
only one order of intelligibility or are there several orders? Are
there today stammering not-sciences which can be tomorrow
more scientific
sciences than our current ones?
And further, still more
fundamentally, these questions at the frontiers of our physical
world. Why is there something rather than nothing? What is the act of
being? What is existence? What is creation? What is necessity? What
is chance?
And even further. What is spirit?
What is reason? What about the requirement for rationality? What
about the mystery of speaking? What about the possible questioning ad
infinitum? What is value? What is truth? What about the infinite
critical possibility of the spirit? What about the irrepressible
protestation for justice? Why the human gaping?
Our obviousness and our
questioning remains floating in the middle of 'between'.

Thus the scientific reason, for
example, is like a 'bubble' floating on infinity. Its spherical
coherence occupies the vast space of the middle. The extremes are
excluded from it. Which sense, however, can it have, the middle,
without its extremes?
goto