Systemic totality
The
complexity of the interactions of a world that we discover
increasingly complex is such, today, that it is likely to disconcert
the intelligence. The forest is not seen any more, hidden by a
proliferation of trees. To embrace the whole of our complexity with
its multiple interactions calls for a new tool of intelligibility. It
is called systemic.
It is not to be confused with 'systematic'! Because this kind of
intelligibility is not coming from one 'system' and is not dependant
on the internal contents of a system. On the other hand, it
apprehends the systems, any system, as a system. It makes it possible
to understand the whole without necessarily having to understand the
internal complexity of each part. It is enough to treat it like a
'black
box'.
The
parts are indeed infinite, and, therefore, ask for an infinity of
specialists
on bottom of an infinite debate. So that in extreme cases the world
can fall into pieces before foreseeing the beginning of a
possible comprehension.
It occurs as if, at the image of the material world, the
spiritual order were spread out in a specific ecosystem of spiritual
energy. In the biosphere there are vital elements like water or air
which are however quite common. We take really cognisance of it only
when they are suddenly missing. The same occurs with the spiritual dynamics. Until
today we did not know that its absence was mortal.
We lived unconsciously with its superabundance. We produced it quite
naturally more than we consumed it. Our tanks overflowed with it.
Human realities, spiritual realities, are understood through the paradigm of natural and
material realities. It is necessary to start by reflecting on what is
an ecosystem
and how it is threatened with death when an opening is refused it. The
total human space, our large 'house' - oïkos
in Greek - who integrates the systems of our earth in interdependent
unit and in interaction is called ecosystem. An
ecosystem
is closed
in relation to the elements.
This means that it functions with a finished
quantity
of material possibilities. The ecosystem has to balance its
assessment. On the other hand it is open
in relation to energy.
The reality and the operation of the human reality can be regarded as systemic
at the image of any alive organic system. It functions according to
the paradigm of every 'system' with an entry,
an exit
and a function,
in interaction with other included or including systems. It has
borders
which mark the difference between an 'inside' and an 'outside',
between a 'fence' and a 'opening'. This essential opening
is denied only under penalty of death. A system can certainly
function within its fence.
But only for a time.
Here any autonomy is function of available
reserves. A system can remain closed
only as long its tanks are not empty and the internal recycling of
its waste is possible. Theoretically a system is 'absolute' provided
that it is not included
by a more including system.

There is like an interactive
interlocking
of the systems from smallest on to the largest. Between the smallest
possible micro-system and the totality of the cosmic macro-system,
'a' system is each time a set which functions between other sets. So nature functions as a solidarity of tangled up systems. On each
systemic level, there are thus an entry and an exit in interactive
connection with the entries and the exits of the other systems,
included and including ones.
The
human space time defines each time what is thinkable and what is
unthinkable, what is feasible and what is not feasible, what is
possible and what is impossible. Because everything is not possible
anywhere and at any time. Thus, for instance, the thirteenth century
has it possibilities that we do not have any more and misses the
possibilities that we have today. Whereas we do so easily believe
that our thinkable and our possible of today are 'impassable', how
will the future thirty-fifth century, for example, perceive it?
Such
a space is characterized by a reference frame, a horizon, axes and a
centre. A reference frame which determines the fundamental
dimensions. A horizon which traces the limits of its theoretical and
practical possibilities and impossibilities. Axes marking the broad
outlines of force according to which this possible is articulated. A
centre, node of convergence of the fundamental axes.

You cannot find the key of intelligibility of
the human realm in the included
contents. You find it in the including
whole. The interior becomes fully understandable only starting from
outside. It is from 'outside' and from outside only that the 'whole'
appears in truth. The
forest explains the trees and not the reverse. The
whole is more essential than the parts.
The schizoid
anthropocentric enclosure by which modernity gets to itself buckles
humanity on humanity. For the first time since man exists, the 'human
make up' system starts to function in strict enclosure. This means
the human reality has continuously to heat itself, in strict
autonomy, its hot source of sense and of significances. This means
also it has to find ways for recycling efficiently its waste and to
reload by itself and from itself its semantic accumulators.
However,
up to its extreme finite enclosure, modernity does not cease, indeed,
taking part, often in spite of it, and more unconsciously than
consciously, of some 'transcendence'. Without this subterfuge it
could not survive a long time without succumbing to asphyxiation.
Thus the rupture with the hot source is never consumed. And
especially the accumulators are never completely discharged.
Even
the most radical absurdity does not succumb to its own logic becausethe powerful accumulators of semantic energy are not yet flat. Especially those of Judeo-Christian signifiance.
More
than it dares to acknowledge it, our modern world functions despite
everything, even by surreptitious participation, on a formidable
reserve of sense, true capital of spiritual energy made up during the
Western history.
The
ecosystem of the sense is the large house of the sense, the large
spiritual matrix in which humans are generated and educated as
humans.
goto